The Queen was in the news the other day at the Commonwealth Conference in Malta. In an uncharacteristic moment, she made a quip about the Canadian Prime Minister making her feel somewhat old. I knew exactly what she meant. I think we all go through those stages in our working lives.
Perhaps middle age starts when one day you wake up to find that your boss is younger than you. A real crisis sets in when someone enters the team who is less than half your age. It is of course great to see the Queen and Prince Philip in good health and I am sure that fish have had a big role to play in that somewhere.
On the face of it, my chances of getting to meet the Queen are hovering close to zero. My prospects of a knighthood or other honours award are significantly less than that of a thumping great national lottery jackpot win. However, due to an unusual piece of law, a circumstance might just arise when the day job will require me to theoretically call the monarch with some important news. In a law known as de Prerogativa Regis dating back to the reign of Edward II, the law has decreed that whales, porpoises and sturgeons are royal fish. In other words they belong to the monarch and must be offered to the reigning sovereign upon capture or shortly thereafter. It is, I have to admit, a bit of a long shot to think we might end up with any of these species in a future River Severn lock stoppage fish rescue, but stranger things have happened.
However, just a few weeks back and totally out of the blue, an angling customer sent me a photograph of a sturgeon that he had been sent. It turns out that it was a specimen of the sterlet species Acipenser ruthenus which is a member of the sturgeon family. The specimen was caught on rod and line in a Canal & River Trust owned canal in Yorkshire just a few weeks ago. As sterlets are a non-native species, the law is quite clear in that the fish must not be returned to the waterway. Now I am beginning to think that I need to seek clarification as a matter of some urgency as to whether legally the sterlet is a royal fish or whether like other canal fish it is the property of the Trust. In the event that one is ever caught again, will I have to ensure it is offered to her majesty? It’s a topic high on the agenda for the next meeting I have with the Trusts’ legal team.
The Fishmongers’ Company is one of the twenty great livery companies with a wonderful headquarters building on the banks of the Thames, a stone’s throw from London Bridge. If the opportunity ever arises for a visit, snap it up. The Duke of Edinburgh was the prime warden of the Fishmongers Company for a while back in the 1960s. Although I have no inside information as to the royal shopping list, it would not surprise me one bit if fish was a significant part of the royal diet. It’s well known that many fish species contain plenty of essential omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids that keep cell membranes sufficiently fluid whilst also lowering blood cholesterol levels. However, at least one royal in times gone by rather overdid the fish component of his diet.
According to chronicler Henry of Huntington, King Henry I, William the Conqueror’s youngest son, died shortly after eating a large number of lampreys baked in a pie. Apparently, Henry went against his physician’s advice, as lamprey pie in excess was believed to be a food of bad humour. I don’t suppose dietary advice regarding lampreys gets much of a mention in the syllabus of undergraduate medical students these days. Come to think of it, none of my former students have ever mentioned it. King Henry was not alone in royal circles for his love of lampreys; King John was definitely a fan. He even levied a lamprey related fine on the City of Gloucester which did little for his opinion poll rating in that part of the world.
However, despite Kings Johns efforts, the City of Gloucester did continue to show its loyalty to the royal family for hundreds of years by presenting the sovereign with a lamprey pie each Christmas. This was sometimes a costly gift, as the lampreys used (sea lampreys) would have been very rare as they tend not to move upstream into freshwater until the spring. The custom was discontinued in the 1830s, probably because sea lampreys were simply becoming unobtainable by that time. However the tradition has not died out entirely. These days the City of Gloucester send a lamprey pie to the monarch only at times of coronations and jubilees. And so it was that in 2012 Queen Elizabeth received another lamprey pie. However, it is understood that the lampreys for this pie were sourced from North America rather than from the UK. I wonder what it tasted like.
Last date edited: 29 July 2016
The team undertake a diverse range of work including looking after the Trust's £40 million worth of fish stocks, managing agreements with over 250 different angling clubs and helping more people, especially youngsters, take up angling on the canal. Follow this blog to keep updated with the thoughts and work of the team.See more blogs from this author